Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp"

From: Mark Davis (mark.davis@jtcsv.com)
Date: Thu May 08 2003 - 10:51:15 EDT

  • Next message: John Cowan: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compat ibility decomp""

    > What's stopping you from initiating either of your ideas today?

    Asmus has been discussing this for some time, but it will takes a lot
    of work that has not yet been done, nor is there agreement on a number
    of issues, including whether normalization is tailored at all.

    Märk Davis
    ________
    mark.davis@jtcsv.com
    IBM, MS 50-2/B11, 5600 Cottle Rd, SJ CA 95193
    (408) 256-3148
    fax: (408) 256-0799

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Theodore H. Smith" <delete@elfdata.com>
    To: <unicode@unicode.org>
    Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 03:30
    Subject: Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a
    "compatibility decomp"

    > > Amen, brother! Testi-fie!
    >
    > > That Cleanicode project is (or ought to be) distinct from
    > > the kind of project that Asmus has in mind of providing
    > > more precise, graduated, equivalence mappings that can
    > > be useful to implementations to actually produce the
    > > results that people expect, but which they may not get today
    > > just based on normalization forms.
    >
    > What's stopping you from initiating either of your ideas today?
    >
    > It's always a good thing to have a more clean and modern approach.
    I'm
    > sure this will pay off in more ways than anticipated, at least thats
    > what I find happens when I modernise my code or website. (The main
    > section of my website isn't that modernised, it just one section
    that
    > is).
    >
    > --
    > Theodore H. Smith - Macintosh Consultant / Contractor.
    > My website: <www.elfdata.com/>
    >
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 08 2003 - 12:20:34 EDT