RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compat ibility decomp"

• Previous message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
• Maybe in reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compat ibility decomp""
• Next in thread: Jonathan Coxhead: "RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
• Reply: Jonathan Coxhead: "RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

                                                   oɔɹɐɯ ¯

                               ¿ˌˌsʇɔǝɟɟǝɹǝʇɟɐˌˌ ʇnoqɐ ʍoɥ

# (the longest word you can write upside-down in Unicode <
[2.1] is `aftereffect´) <
                          :ǝʇoɹʍ pɐǝɥxoɔ ·ɹɯ puɐ uɐʍoɔ ·ɹɯ

• Next message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Discussion/Notices re: fonts"
• Previous message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
• Maybe in reply to: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compat ibility decomp""
• Next in thread: Jonathan Coxhead: "RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
• Reply: Jonathan Coxhead: "RE: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 08 2003 - 13:07:39 EDT