Re: Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp"

From: Ben Dougall (bend@freenet.co.uk)
Date: Wed May 07 2003 - 18:36:04 EDT

Next message: John Cowan: "Possible Neolithic writing in China"

Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: ISO 6438, the Niamey keyboard, and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG1"
Maybe in reply to: Theodore H. Smith: "Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> if the documentation that you're talking about isn't the unicode v3
> pdf book, have a look at it. it may help: pg 44 D20-24 where it
> describes those two things.

oops, missed out 'chapter 3', pg 44...

Next message: John Cowan: "Possible Neolithic writing in China"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: ISO 6438, the Niamey keyboard, and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG1"
Maybe in reply to: Theodore H. Smith: "Still can't work out whats a "canonical decomp" vs a "compatibility decomp""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 14 2003 - 16:36:02 EDT