Re: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii

From: Stefan Persson (alsjebegrijptwatikbedoel@yahoo.se)
Date: Fri May 16 2003 - 14:24:35 EDT

  • Next message: Addison Phillips [wM]: "RE: Unicode conformant character encodings and us-ascii"

    Peter underscore Constable at sil dot org wrote:

    > These might be considered encoding forms, and they might be able to encode
    > the Unicode coded character set, but I don't think these should be called
    > "Unicode encoding forms". There are exactly three Unicode encoding forms:
    > UTF-8, UTF-16 and UTF-32.

    Are not BE and LE regarded as different encoding forms, making five
    encoding forms (UTF-8, UTF-16BE, UTF-16LE, UTF-32BE & UTF-32LE)?

    Stefan

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 16 2003 - 15:13:18 EDT