Re: PUA glyphs in fonts (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient forOriental languages?)

• Previous message: Sayamindu Dasgupta: "[Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters"
• In reply to: William Overington: "Re: PUA glyphs in fonts (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient forOriental languages?)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> quote
>
> SVG has a *ton* of stuff to capture William's interest for endless hours.
>
> end quote
>
> In one thread Mr Constable says that I should not post about eutocode
> graphics, yet in this thread he mentions me in relation to a graphics
system
> which is less to do with Unicode!
>
> Since Mr Constable mentions me, I feel that it is only fair that I am
> allowed to defend myself.

You need to defend yourself against a statement that SVG might be of
interest to you?

- Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485

• Next message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: "default ignorable" posts (was Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficientfor Oriental languages?)"
• Previous message: Sayamindu Dasgupta: "[Maybe OT] localized names of the Unicode Control characters"
• In reply to: William Overington: "Re: PUA glyphs in fonts (was: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient forOriental languages?)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 26 2003 - 10:04:42 EDT