From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Mon May 26 2003 - 13:38:13 EDT
Philippe Verdy wrote on 05/26/2003 06:45:53 PM:
> For me the only symbols that clearly would be non ambiguous as
> meaning empty is an empty pair () of parentheses, possibly with a
> thin space in the middle.
But this is definitely *not* the conventional symbolisation used by
linguists that Andrew was wanting to encode.
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 27 2003 - 02:30:45 EDT