RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)

From: Marco Cimarosti (marco.cimarosti@essetre.it)
Date: Wed May 28 2003 - 10:24:58 EDT

Next message: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: "default ignorable" posts"

Previous message: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)"
Maybe in reply to: Theodore H. Smith: "Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)"
Next in thread: Carl W. Brown: "RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)"
Reply: Carl W. Brown: "RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "More savvy logos"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Philippe Verdy wrote:
> Savvy is better understood in this context as "aware", than
> "archaic" or "informal" in your English-Italian dictionnary.

No, "archaic", "American" and "informal" are usage labels, not translations.
The translation is "buon senso". (BTW, it is: "Dizionario Garzanti di
inglese", Garzanti Editore, 1997, ISBN 88-11-10212-X)

_ Marco

Next message: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: "default ignorable" posts"
Previous message: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)"
Maybe in reply to: Theodore H. Smith: "Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)"
Next in thread: Carl W. Brown: "RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)"
Reply: Carl W. Brown: "RE: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "More savvy logos"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 28 2003 - 11:17:48 EDT