Re: Dutch IJ, again

From: Pim Blokland (pblokland@planet.nl)
Date: Wed May 28 2003 - 10:41:34 EDT

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: “book end” or <enclosing characters> in most languages?"

Previous message: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: "default ignorable" posts"
In reply to: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Dutch IJ, again"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Dutch IJ, again"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter Constable schreef:

> Whatever happened to CGJ?

Too new, probably.
People (and software applications) aren't used to this one yet.

Pim Blokland

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: “book end” or <enclosing characters> in most languages?"
Previous message: Christopher John Fynn: "Re: "default ignorable" posts"
In reply to: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Dutch IJ, again"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Dutch IJ, again"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 28 2003 - 11:38:18 EDT