From: Rick McGowan (rick@unicode.org)
Date: Wed May 28 2003 - 18:08:44 EDT
Since nobody else is saying anything even semi-official, let me
inject... As we move through this discussion of snazziness and visual
aspects of the "Unicode Savvy" logo, people should keep a couple of
things in mind:
1. UTC has not grappled with what "compliant" means, and unless/until
that happens, you're not going to see that word used in conjunction with
any logo or stamp of approval. You can also rule out "conformant".
2. It is unikely that the Unicode *logo* itself (i.e. the thing at
http://www.unicode.org/webscripts/logo60s2.gif) will be incorporated
directly in any image that people are allowed to put on their websites,
because to put the Unicode logo on a product or whatever requires a
license agreement. I.e. the submissions from E. Trager are out of scope
because they contain the Unicode logo on the left side.
Those are just some things to keep in mind...
Rick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 28 2003 - 18:54:22 EDT
