Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)

From: John Cowan (cowan@mercury.ccil.org)
Date: Wed May 28 2003 - 23:32:32 EDT

  • Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Not snazzy (was: New Unicode Savvy Logo)"

    Tom Gewecke scripsit:

    > I wonder about this. The Unicode FAQ makes the point that some browsers
    > will not display NCR's unless the charset is UTF-8.

    Netscape 4.x is dead.

    > It does seem logical
    > that, NCR's or not, a page with the logo should be in one of the three
    > standard Unicode Encoding Forms, UTF-8, 16, or 32.

    I agree. 

    -- 
A poetical purist named Cowan           [that's me: jcowan@reutershealth.com]
Once put the rest of us dowan.          [on xml-dev]
    "Your verse would be sweeter        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    If it only had metre                http://www.reutershealth.com
And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan."     [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 29 2003 - 00:14:42 EDT