From: Marco Cimarosti (marco.cimarosti@essetre.it)
Date: Thu May 29 2003 - 06:12:38 EDT
Rick McGowan wrote:
> 2. It is unikely that the Unicode *logo* itself (i.e. the thing at
> http://www.unicode.org/webscripts/logo60s2.gif) will be incorporated
> directly in any image that people are allowed to put on their
> websites, because to put the Unicode logo on a product or whatever
> requires a license agreement. I.e. the submissions from E. Trager
> are out of scope because they contain the Unicode logo on the
> left side.
As this comes from an Unicode official, I guess we should simply accept
it... Nevertheless, I wonder whether displaying the Unicode *logo* per se
has the same legal implication as displaying a *banner* which contains the
Unicode logo.
IMVHO, that seems like the difference between producing a T-shirt with the
Unicode logo and wearing it. In the first case, I must demonstrate that I
asked and obtained the permission from the trade-mark owner; in the second
case, I don't have to demonstrate anything (apart, maybe, that I did not
steal that piece of garment).
_ Marco
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 29 2003 - 07:04:04 EDT
