Re: [OT reversing letters to avoid offence] Re: [Fwd: Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?]

From: Stefan Persson (alsjebegrijptwatikbedoel@yahoo.se)
Date: Mon Dec 15 2003 - 15:17:51 EST

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: [OT] Euro-English (was: Corea? (Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?)"

Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: [OT reversing letters to avoid offence] Re: [Fwd: Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?]"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: [OT reversing letters to avoid offence] Re: [Fwd: Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?]"
Reply: Doug Ewell: "Re: [OT reversing letters to avoid offence] Re: [Fwd: Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Doug Ewell wrote:
> One way to do that in Unicode would involve Canadian Syllabics: AᗺBA or
> even ᗅᗺᗷᗅ.

Can't it just be considered a glyph variant of "ABBA"?

Stefan

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: [OT] Euro-English (was: Corea? (Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?)"
Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: [OT] CJK -> CJC (Re: Corea?)"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: [OT reversing letters to avoid offence] Re: [Fwd: Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?]"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: [OT reversing letters to avoid offence] Re: [Fwd: Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?]"
Reply: Doug Ewell: "Re: [OT reversing letters to avoid offence] Re: [Fwd: Re: Swastika to be banned by Microsoft?]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 15 2003 - 15:58:48 EST