From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Mon Dec 15 2003 - 16:50:35 EST
>> One way to do that in Unicode would involve Canadian Syllabics:
>> AᗺBA or even ᗅᗺᗷᗅ.
>
> Can't it just be considered a glyph variant of "ABBA"?
Of course it is. I was being facetious, in the spirit of the thread.
It is just as much a glyph variant as the "ya" in Toys 'Я' Us.
-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 15 2003 - 18:07:44 EST