From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Wed Dec 17 2003 - 00:54:37 EST
Philippe Verdy <verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr> wrote:
> Well Outlook 2000 is unable to represent any e with ogonek and trema
> of your example. So, despite they are canonically equivalent, they are
> rendered differently:
Everything rendered perfectly over here, on Windows 95 and Outlook
Express 5 (and Uniscribe). You might try switching to Lucida Sans
Unicode, if you have it.
-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 17 2003 - 02:10:37 EST