From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Tue Feb 17 2004 - 16:32:15 EST
> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
On Behalf
> Of Michael Everson
> >*hxC(V)- ~ *shxC(V)- [the x's to be subscripted]
> >
> >are more like mathematical formulae than text.
>
> They are not mathematical formulae. It is a kind of linguistic
> (though not phonetic) notation.
Yes. In case anyone isn't sure what the notation means, I believe it is
as follows (assuming these works are typical of works in historical
linguistics):
* precedes a transcription to indicate it is a historical reconstruction
posited by inference from data obtained from later periods in time
~ is used to indicate an alternation; thus, *hxC(V) is in alternation
with *shxC(V)
s and h are symbols for particular phonemes; as indicated in the doc, hx
is being used to represent the laryngeal with uncertain vowel coloring
C and V, of course, represent an arbitrary consonant and vowel
( ) denotes optionality; thus, the above notation is short hand for *hxC
~ *shxC and *hxCV ~ *shxCV
So, the expression *hxC(V)- ~ *shxC(V) is saying, in relation to certain
phoneme sequences known to exist in later varieties, that an earlier
precedessor to the language(s) in question is believed to have had hC or
shC, and hCV or shCV (with the vowel colouring on the h unknown or left
unspecified).
Peter
Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 17 2004 - 17:15:25 EST