RE: (SC2WG2.609) New contribution N2705

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Wed Feb 18 2004 - 10:19:41 EST

Next message: Antoine Leca: "Re: Devanagari Letter Short A"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: (SC2WG2.609) New contribution N2705"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: (SC2WG2.609) New contribution N2705"
Next in thread: Deborah W. Anderson: "RE: (SC2WG2.609) New contribution N2705"
Reply: Deborah W. Anderson: "RE: (SC2WG2.609) New contribution N2705"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: Philippe Verdy [mailto:verdy_p@wanadoo.fr]

> But I still think it would be
> a bad prececent for Unicode if it starts accepting some very specific
notational
> systems used in a fonted document written with a author's own choice,
where
> subscripts/superscripts/italics would be used only in relation with
author's
> specific notation

Here, I can agree with you.

Peter

Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division

Next message: Antoine Leca: "Re: Devanagari Letter Short A"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: (SC2WG2.609) New contribution N2705"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: (SC2WG2.609) New contribution N2705"
Next in thread: Deborah W. Anderson: "RE: (SC2WG2.609) New contribution N2705"
Reply: Deborah W. Anderson: "RE: (SC2WG2.609) New contribution N2705"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 18 2004 - 11:14:04 EST