RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon May 10 2004 - 15:11:27 CDT

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Subject lines that have nothing to do with message content"

Previous message: E. Keown: "Re: Phoenician"
In reply to: Mike Ayers: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Next in thread: Patrick Andries: "Script vs Writing System"
Reply: Patrick Andries: "Script vs Writing System"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 12:12 -0700 2004-05-10, Mike Ayers wrote:
>But all this leads me to finally ask: what does "script" mean? It
>seems clear to me that although the term has been used throughout
>the Phoenician debate, not everyone is using it the same way. I
>know that there is a definition of "script" that is used for
>encoding purposes, but can I find it written anywhere, or is it more
>of an ephemeral thing?

I am way too jetlagged to go near this one today.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Subject lines that have nothing to do with message content"
Previous message: E. Keown: "Re: Phoenician"
In reply to: Mike Ayers: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Next in thread: Patrick Andries: "Script vs Writing System"
Reply: Patrick Andries: "Script vs Writing System"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 10 2004 - 15:15:04 CDT