Re: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)

From: Stefan Persson (alsjebegrijptwatikbedoel@yahoo.se)
Date: Mon May 10 2004 - 16:07:41 CDT

Next message: Patrick Andries: "Script vs Writing System"

Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Subject lines that have nothing to do with message content"
In reply to: Mike Ayers: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Japanese line breaks (was: interleaved ordering)"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Japanese line breaks (was: interleaved ordering)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Mike Ayers wrote:
> I have not seen
> katakana joined to kanji (or romaji), and suspect that such does not occur.

There are a few cases, e.g. ソ連 (So-Ren: Soviet Union), but that could
also be written as two kanji as 蘇連 (which is however very rare in
modern Japanese).

> I believe, but am not certain, that nonbreaking
> kanji-to-hiragana is correct, whereas you can break on kanji-to-katakana.

In Japanese you can put a line break between *any* characer, except
before punctuation & end quote or after start quote.

Stefan

Next message: Patrick Andries: "Script vs Writing System"
Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Subject lines that have nothing to do with message content"
In reply to: Mike Ayers: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Japanese line breaks (was: interleaved ordering)"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Japanese line breaks (was: interleaved ordering)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 10 2004 - 16:10:17 CDT