From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 12:55:31 CDT
> From: E. Keown [mailto:k_isoetc@yahoo.com]
> For a small percentage of early Semitics stuff, it
> would be convenient to be able to automatically
> reverse the direction in a database, so the retrieval
> algorithm could look at 'both directions.'
It's not clear to me what you have in mind. The directionality issue
exists only when text is displayed. In a database, all text is linear
from logical beginning to end, and without any spatial direction. The
linear sequence may contain layout control characters such as RLE
(U+202B) that will affect how display processes operate, but I wouldn't
expect a retrieval algorithm to be particular interested in those layout
controls. For a given piece of text "abc", does it matter to you whether
in the source manuscript / tablet / whatever "abc" occurred in a RTL run
vs. a LTR run? If not (which is what I suspect), then it will work the
way you want without any extra work.
> Is there a larger 'boustrophedon' note in Unicode 4.0?
> Is there any interest in expanding the bidi algorithm
> to definitely cover all possible RTL - LTR
> boustropheda (plural?) ?
No; any directionality issues beyond the mixing of directions within a
*single* line is considered out-of-scope for Unicode, and are to be
handled by higher-level specifications and mechanisms, such as document
markup.
> I assume that there is *no* complete list online of
> all possible writing direction configurations.
The obvious possibilities are obvious. The others are unlikely, but also
not enumerable. I don't know of any comprehensive list; perhaps others
do.
> The discussion so far on the list doesn't appear to me
> to cover every possibility....my impression is that
> there are probably sub-varieties of boustrophedon
Sure: in the alternate lines, is the orientation of equivalent
characters the same? mirrored? rotated? other?
Peter
Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 14 2004 - 12:56:36 CDT