Re: Multiple Directions (was: Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician))

From: jcowan@reutershealth.com
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 15:29:41 CDT

Next message: Ernest Cline: "Re: Bidi Mirroring and Ogham (was: Multiple Directions)"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: TR35"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Multiple Directions (was: Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician))"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: Multiple Directions (was: Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson scripsit:

> >Which is as much to say that R2L Ogham is illegible. But is T2B Ogham
> >necessarily illegible, especially if the glyphs were to be reversed?
>
> Try it and see. ;-)

It's all Greek to me.

-- 
"How they ever reached any conclusion at all    jcowan@reutershealth.com>
is starkly unknowable to the human mind."       http://www.reutershealth.com
        --"Backstage Lensman", Randall Garrett  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

Next message: Ernest Cline: "Re: Bidi Mirroring and Ogham (was: Multiple Directions)"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: TR35"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Multiple Directions (was: Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician))"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: Multiple Directions (was: Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 14 2004 - 15:30:24 CDT