Re: [BULK] - Re: Interleaved collation of related scripts

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 16:37:22 CDT

Next message: jameskass@att.net: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"

Previous message: Mike Ayers: "RE: [BULK] - Re: Interleaved collation of related scripts"
In reply to: Mike Ayers: "RE: [BULK] - Re: Interleaved collation of related scripts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

RE: [BULK] - Re: Interleaved collation of related scriptsOne favor --
when talking about search engines that convert Palaeo-Hebrew or
Phoenician or whatever into modern Hebrew, can we please avoid the word
"normalization"?

That has a very specific meaning in Unicode, and I'd hate for somebody
to leave this thread thinking that characters from different encoded
scripts would be made canonical equivalents of one another.

-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: jameskass@att.net: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
Previous message: Mike Ayers: "RE: [BULK] - Re: Interleaved collation of related scripts"
In reply to: Mike Ayers: "RE: [BULK] - Re: Interleaved collation of related scripts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 14 2004 - 16:37:14 CDT