RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)

• Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: [BULK] - Re: Interleaved collation of related scripts"
• Maybe in reply to: Kent Karlsson: "interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
• Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Dean A. Snyder wrote,

> You only make a response regarding Google; but that is only one of the
> search engines; and it leaves issues with operating systems and database
> engines still unanswered.

http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr10/#Tailoring

The entire report contains much useful information about what
a default collation table should and should not try to do. There
are also handy examples illustrating that different users will
have differing expectations even in the same script.

Best regards,

James Kass

• Next message: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Multiple Directions (was: Re: Coptic/Greek (Re: Phoenician))"
• Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: [BULK] - Re: Interleaved collation of related scripts"
• Maybe in reply to: Kent Karlsson: "interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
• Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 14 2004 - 16:40:05 CDT