justifying encoding (was RE: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?)

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 09:23:13 CDT

  • Next message: Curtis Clark: "Re: Fraktur yet again (was: Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?)"

    > From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
    On
    > Behalf Of Mark E. Shoulson
    > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 5:47 AM

    > The fact that there are people who would be
    > served by it indicates that Unicode should provide it.

    Careful, here: the fact that people would be served by it indicates that
    UTC should *consider* providing it. But the further consideration is
    whether those people can be served *without* it. If they would be served
    by it and cannot be well served without it, *then* we conclude that UTC
    should provide it.

    Peter Constable

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 24 2004 - 09:23:50 CDT