Re: New Public Review Issue posted

From: D. Starner (shalesller@writeme.com)
Date: Wed May 26 2004 - 13:19:47 CDT

Next message: Dean Snyder: "Re: Palaeo-Hebrew, Phoenician, and Unicode (Phoenician Unicode proposal)"

Previous message: saqqara: "Re: Glyph Stance"
Maybe in reply to: Rick McGowan: "New Public Review Issue posted"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: New Public Review Issue posted"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: New Public Review Issue posted"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Mark Davis" <mark.davis@jtcsv.com> writes:

> Why modifier letters -- those are not really
> superscripts. Waw?

Last time I went looking for Modifier Letter Small N,
I decided it was encoded as U+207F, SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL
LETTER N. If it's not, pretty much every variant of n has
been encoded as a modifier letter, except for the basic small
letter.

-- 
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm

Next message: Dean Snyder: "Re: Palaeo-Hebrew, Phoenician, and Unicode (Phoenician Unicode proposal)"
Previous message: saqqara: "Re: Glyph Stance"
Maybe in reply to: Rick McGowan: "New Public Review Issue posted"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: New Public Review Issue posted"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: New Public Review Issue posted"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 26 2004 - 13:20:52 CDT