Re: New Public Review Issue posted

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed May 26 2004 - 13:42:07 CDT

Next message: Mike Ayers: "RE: [BULK] - Re: Phoenician, Fraktur etc"

Previous message: Dean Snyder: "Re: Palaeo-Hebrew, Phoenician, and Unicode (Phoenician Unicode proposal)"
In reply to: D. Starner: "Re: New Public Review Issue posted"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: New Public Review Issue posted"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 10:19 -0800 2004-05-26, D. Starner wrote:
>"Mark Davis" <mark.davis@jtcsv.com> writes:
>
>> Why modifier letters -- those are not really
>> superscripts. Waw?
>
>Last time I went looking for Modifier Letter Small N,
>I decided it was encoded as U+207F, SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL
>LETTER N. If it's not, pretty much every variant of n has
>been encoded as a modifier letter, except for the basic small
>letter.

That's it.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Mike Ayers: "RE: [BULK] - Re: Phoenician, Fraktur etc"
Previous message: Dean Snyder: "Re: Palaeo-Hebrew, Phoenician, and Unicode (Phoenician Unicode proposal)"
In reply to: D. Starner: "Re: New Public Review Issue posted"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: New Public Review Issue posted"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 26 2004 - 13:44:34 CDT