From: Andrew C. West (andrewcwest@alumni.princeton.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 02:53:34 CST
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 01:10:33 +0100, Michael Everson wrote:
>
> It does suggest that the DEGREE sign is not "really" the right
> character for the second part of the Numero sign. In my view either
> U+1D52 or Masculine Ordinal would be preferable (if the latter has no
> underbar, since U+02E2 has no underbar).
>
I also had always assumed that the second part of the Numero sign was a
superscript "o", which was why I was somewhat suprised to see that you use "N°"
(N-degree) on <http://www.unicode.org/iso15924/iso15924-codes.html>. There
doesn't seem to be anything in the Unicode Standard to indicate such a usage of
the degree sign.
Andrew
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 02:54:11 CST