From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 02:59:28 CST
At 04:10 PM 3/31/2005, Michael Everson wrote:
>At 15:51 -0800 2005-03-31, Patrick Andries wrote:
>
>>>U+004E U+1D52 U+02E2
>>
>>Correct, I must have last tried this before Unicode 4.0, before U+1D52
>>was introduced.
>>
>>(I'm not sure anyone uses these characters to write N<sup>os</sup> in
>>real life though).
>
>It does suggest that the DEGREE sign is not "really" the right character
>for the second part of the Numero sign. In my view either U+1D52 or
>Masculine Ordinal would be preferable (if the latter has no underbar,
>since U+02E2 has no underbar).
>
>I can hear Ken groan at this misuse of characters.
Not just Ken.
A./
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 03:00:08 CST