From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:00:39 CST
On 13/04/2005 21:06, Otto Stolz wrote:
> ...
> It would, however, be more useful to the general public, if you would
> communicate your
> knowledge through the official channels, ... This would amount to
> pinpointing an actual error, or inaccuracy, in TUS
> (by chapter and verse), collecting evidence for the error or suggested
> amendmend,
> checking the Errata page at <http://www.unicode.org/errata/>, wording
> a correction,
> and delivering all of this information to
> <http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html>.
>
But I thought Ken had just told us that error reports on character names
made through these channels would be ignored. In fact Ken's words were:
>... both committees to decide that past a certain point
>such defect reports would be noted but not acted upon, insofar
>as they were requests for changes in names of published characters
>in the standards.
>
So isn't your advice just a waste of time?
-- Peter Kirk peter@qaya.org (personal) peterkirk@qaya.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 14 2005 - 13:38:37 CST