From: Hans Aberg (haberg@math.su.se)
Date: Sat May 14 2005 - 07:36:48 CDT
The Greek letters, relative the Latin ones, in the Mathematical
Alphanumeric Symbols, seem incomplete. The Latin letters exist in the
following forms:
<none>
MATHEMATICAL BOLD
MATHEMATICAL ITALIC
MATHEMATICAL BOLD ITALIC
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF BOLD
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF ITALIC
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF BOLD ITALIC
whereas the Greek letters only have
<none>
MATHEMATICAL BOLD
MATHEMATICAL ITALIC
MATHEMATICAL BOLD ITALIC
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF BOLD
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF BOLD ITALIC
apparently missing the forms:
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF ITALIC
I should say that in traditional math, I think that that only the
following forms are necessary:
<none>
MATHEMATICAL BOLD
MATHEMATICAL ITALIC
MATHEMATICAL BOLD ITALIC
all traditionally typeset having serifs. One possible pure math usage
might be that non-ITALIC (i.e., not slanted) forms are used for
constants, ITALIC forms for variables; BOLD forms to indicate
multi-component forms (such as vectors), as opposed to the non-bold
single component objects. There is no point to discuss the very
varied actual math usage here, which depends on tradition which in
its turn depends on pats availability of glyphs, and different
communities, such as engineers, would do it differently, different
groups having incompatible practises.
But it means that all forms needed in math already are present, but
the Latin letters got some extra forms that are seemingly absent in
the Greek forms.
-- Hans Aberg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 14 2005 - 07:37:57 CDT