From: Murray Sargent (murrays@exchange.microsoft.com)
Date: Sat May 14 2005 - 15:51:36 CDT
The STIX committee (see http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr25/ for
references) chose the sets of mathematical alphanumerics. I agree with
you that sans-serif characters in general are rarely used in
mathematics, at least in the mathematics of physics. My guess is that
the STIX committee didn't find enough mathematical usage for sans-serif
upright and italic Greek characters to justify including them. One can
always resort back to higher-level character formatting to render such
characters, but then the sans-serif distinction is lost on export to
plain text. Such loss would imply a change in semantics. But so far,
anyhow, we haven't seen a need for mathematical sans-serif and
sans-serif italic Greek sets.
Murray
-----Original Message-----
From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On
Behalf Of Hans Aberg
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 5:37 AM
To: Unicode List
Subject: Mathematical Greek Alphanumeric Symbols
The Greek letters, relative the Latin ones, in the Mathematical
Alphanumeric Symbols, seem incomplete. The Latin letters exist in the
following forms:
<none>
MATHEMATICAL BOLD
MATHEMATICAL ITALIC
MATHEMATICAL BOLD ITALIC
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF BOLD
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF ITALIC
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF BOLD ITALIC
whereas the Greek letters only have
<none>
MATHEMATICAL BOLD
MATHEMATICAL ITALIC
MATHEMATICAL BOLD ITALIC
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF BOLD
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF BOLD ITALIC
apparently missing the forms:
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF
MATHEMATICAL SANS-SERIF ITALIC
I should say that in traditional math, I think that that only the
following forms are necessary:
<none>
MATHEMATICAL BOLD
MATHEMATICAL ITALIC
MATHEMATICAL BOLD ITALIC
all traditionally typeset having serifs. One possible pure math usage
might be that non-ITALIC (i.e., not slanted) forms are used for
constants, ITALIC forms for variables; BOLD forms to indicate
multi-component forms (such as vectors), as opposed to the non-bold
single component objects. There is no point to discuss the very varied
actual math usage here, which depends on tradition which in its turn
depends on pats availability of glyphs, and different communities, such
as engineers, would do it differently, different groups having
incompatible practises.
But it means that all forms needed in math already are present, but the
Latin letters got some extra forms that are seemingly absent in the
Greek forms.
-- Hans Aberg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 14 2005 - 15:52:29 CDT