Re: Baseline level line?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu Jun 30 2005 - 04:59:10 CDT

Next message: N. Ganesan: "Arabic 16-bit encodings"

Previous message: Antoine Leca: "Re: Measuring a writing system "economy"/"accuracy""
In reply to: John Hudson: "Baseline level line?"
Next in thread: Eric Muller: "Re: Measuring a writing system "economy"/"accuracy""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 01:27 -0700 2005-06-29, John Hudson wrote:

>I'm looking for an immediate solution, but if there is nothing
>better than U+005F, I'd also be interested to know if anyone thinks
>it would be worthwhile to propose a baseline level line character
>for this purpose.

One would have to show it contrasting with LOW LINE, I suspect.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: N. Ganesan: "Arabic 16-bit encodings"
Previous message: Antoine Leca: "Re: Measuring a writing system "economy"/"accuracy""
In reply to: John Hudson: "Baseline level line?"
Next in thread: Eric Muller: "Re: Measuring a writing system "economy"/"accuracy""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 30 2005 - 05:02:43 CDT