Re: dotted circle

From: Sinnathurai Srivas (sisrivas@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Tue Jul 11 2006 - 15:51:39 CDT

Next message: N. Ganesan: "Telugu conjuncts"

Previous message: Sinnathurai Srivas: "Re: dotted circle"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: dotted circle"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Invisible letter will cause havoc in data processing.

I do not think dotted circle, nor invisible nor any form of forced
conversion of data will cause untold difficulties in the future.

Sinnathurai

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Everson" <everson@evertype.com>
To: "Unicode Discussion" <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: dotted circle

> At 13:57 +0100 2006-07-11, Jonathan Kew wrote:
>>On 11 Jul 2006, at 12:47 pm, N. Ganesan wrote:
>>
>>>Thanks for all thosw who replied
>>>(We will use NBSP in Vista in the future)
>>
>>NBSP is not a solution here, because it will (should) result in the
>>combining mark being displayed on a space, rather than combined with the
>>preceding letter. That *might* be OK, depending exactly how the font is
>>designed, for U+0BBE, for example, but not for U+0B82.
>
> It sounds to me as though we need an INVISIBLE LETTER.
>
> See http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n2822.pdf
>
> --
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
>
>
>

Next message: N. Ganesan: "Telugu conjuncts"
Previous message: Sinnathurai Srivas: "Re: dotted circle"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: dotted circle"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 11 2006 - 15:55:56 CDT