From: Eric Muller (emuller@adobe.com)
Date: Thu Jun 07 2007 - 12:49:12 CDT
I think that what Ambarish is telling is us is that what Unicode has
described as RA_sub (see rule R6 in section 9.1), aka vattu in OpenType,
should really considered as made of two parts, one stroke for RA and one
stroke for a halant.
In everything I have seen from Unicode and OpenType, vattu is viewed as
an atomic object, and is graphically depicted as two connected strokes.
Is it common to display a vattu as two disconnected strokes?
Eric.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 07 2007 - 12:52:55 CDT