Re: New brackets (6 new symbols)

From: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin (antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2007 - 06:25:06 CDT

Next message: Murray Sargent: "RE: New brackets (6 new symbols)"

Previous message: Otto Stolz: "Re: New brackets (6 new symbols)"
In reply to: Dmitry Turin: "New brackets (6 new symbols)"
Next in thread: John H. Jenkins: "Re: New brackets (6 new symbols)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 2007.09.28, 07:21, Dmitry Turin <unicode20@narod.ru> wrote:

> because modern conceptual constructions are complex and consist from
> repeated enclosures, and old brackets are not enough.

Unless one usess only a pair of bracket symbols, and nest them as many
times as nessed, like in everyday MSExcel formulae.

-- 
António MARTINS-Tuválkin                                            ____.
<antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt>                                          |  ()|
                                         Não me invejo de quem tem |####|
PT-1500-111 LISBOA                       carros, parelhas e montes      |
+351 934 821 700, +351 217 150 939       só me invejo de quem bebe      |
ICQ:193279138  http://tuvalkin.web.pt/   a água em todas as fontes      |

Next message: Murray Sargent: "RE: New brackets (6 new symbols)"
Previous message: Otto Stolz: "Re: New brackets (6 new symbols)"
In reply to: Dmitry Turin: "New brackets (6 new symbols)"
Next in thread: John H. Jenkins: "Re: New brackets (6 new symbols)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 28 2007 - 06:40:22 CDT