From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Apr 02 2008 - 01:43:23 CST
At 23:58 +0200 2008-04-01, Dominikus Scherkl wrote:
>Michael Everson schrieb:
>>Please see
>>http://www.evertype.com/standards/iso10646/pdf/n3412-last-resort.pdf
>
>Nice first of April post.
Thank you.
>But if this is a serious proposal,
Certainly. Compare other "unlikely" proposals:
http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n3066.pdf (2006-04-01)
http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n2935.pdf (2005-04-01)
(All right, I have to admit these though:
http://www.evertype.com/standards/iso10646/pdf/n258a-heartdot.pdf (2003-04-01)
http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n2326.pdf (2001-04-01))
>there are some errors:
>- The name of E02A8 should be "LR-10000-1FFFD PLANE-1 UNDEFINED",
> not "LR-0000-FFFD PLANE-1 UNDEFINED"
Thank you. Pasting error.
>- No glyphs for "PLANE-3 UNDEFINED" to "PLANE-13 UNDEFINED"
> and "PLANE-3 NOT A CHARACTER" to "PLANE-13 NOT A CHARACTER"
> (ok, there are no chars assigned, but the more important
> those glyphs would be!)
I was unsure what to do with these. The are "assigned" however...
I did think that I should change
E02F5 LR-F0000-FFFFF SUPPLEMENTARY PRIVATE USE AREA-A
E02F6 LR-FFFFE-FFFFF NONCHARACTERS
to
E02F5 LR-F0000-FFFFD SUPPLEMENTARY PRIVATE USE AREA-A
E02F6 LR-FFFFE-FFFFF NONCHARACTERS
Correct?
>- I still think the Glyph "A" for latin is a very bad choice,
> as this very same glyph is also in cyrillic and greek used.
> Why not some glyph that is unique to latin, and at the same
> time represents the name of the script quite well, like the
> "L" glyph?
I can check to see whether there are other letters found in all of
the Latin blocks, though lower-case "l" is not so distinctive. And
there are "L"s borrowed into Cyrillic (not yet encoded).
-- Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 02 2008 - 05:25:49 CST