From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue Jan 06 2009 - 06:13:02 CST
On 6 Jan 2009, at 06:37, John Hudson wrote:
> One might object that this means any emoji character would require
> four bytes instead of two, but that is also true if Unicode
> surrogate characters are used, and opposition to encoding emoji
> within the BMP seems stiffer than opposition to encoding them per se.
I'm not sure I even want them in the SMP. I'm thinking Plane 14, at
least for the dodgier ones.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 06 2009 - 06:15:10 CST