Re: Emoji-- all or nothing?

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Tue Jan 06 2009 - 13:46:11 CST

  • Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Emoji character identity"

    On 1/6/2009 4:13 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
    > On 6 Jan 2009, at 06:37, John Hudson wrote:
    >
    >> One might object that this means any emoji character would require
    >> four bytes instead of two, but that is also true if Unicode surrogate
    >> characters are used, and opposition to encoding emoji within the BMP
    >> seems stiffer than opposition to encoding them per se.
    >
    > I'm not sure I even want them in the SMP. I'm thinking Plane 14, at
    > least for the dodgier ones.
    Some people have made it clear they prefer plane 15 :-)

    A./

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 06 2009 - 13:47:35 CST