From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Sat Jan 10 2009 - 17:02:57 CST
On 10 Jan 2009, at 21:40, vunzndi@vfemail.net wrote:
> Quoting "Peter Constable" <petercon@microsoft.com>:
>
>> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-
>> bounce@unicode.org] On Behalf Of vunzndi@vfemail.net
>>
>>> I am certain it would be almost impossible to find a person who was
>>> from a country not included in the 10 "flags/localisation symbols"
>>> who
>>> would agree the 10 are sufficient.
>>
>> Well, I have not gone to see which countries are included in the
>> ten and found that my country (Canada) is not included, nor are two
>> other countries in which I have at some time resided (Thailand and
>> Mexico). Nonetheless, I see no need to encode additional flags in
>> the UCS.
>>
>> So, your certainly is clearly not well founded.
>>
>
> Now I know of one exception.
>
> Accepted my words were not the most accurate they could be.
John, I bet you CAD 10 that I can find a Canadian NOT employed by a
major computer company who would not have the same view that Peter has.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 10 2009 - 17:04:29 CST