RE: Old Hungarian at SC2/WG2

From: Erkki I. Kolehmainen (eik@iki.fi)
Date: Thu Mar 19 2009 - 00:39:22 CST

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Old Hungarian at SC2/WG2"

    I wouldn't make such a claim. However, it points out the differences,
    although it hasn't been updated to reflect the changes made to N3526 in
    N3566. Thus, there is no current summary.

    Regards, Erkki

    -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
    Lähettäjä: unicore-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicore-bounce@unicode.org]
    Puolesta Peter Constable
    Lähetetty: 19. maaliskuuta 2009 6:39
    Vastaanottaja: Michael Everson; unicore UnicoRe Discussion; unicode Unicode
    Discussion
    Aihe: RE: Old Hungarian at SC2/WG2

    But is it clear that N3532 represents a consensus position?

    Peter

    -----Original Message-----
    From: unicore-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicore-bounce@unicode.org] On
    Behalf Of Michael Everson
    Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 11:01 AM
    To: unicore UnicoRe Discussion; unicode Unicode Discussion
    Subject: Re: Old Hungarian at SC2/WG2

    On 18 Mar 2009, at 17:46, Asmus Freytag wrote:

    > Given the nature of the script there appears to be no defensible
    > reason why any this should be hurried along - especially in the
    > absence of a clear consensus of a wide range of experts (or ideally
    > all of them).

    Asmus, the document N3532 "Mapping between Old Hungarian proposals in
    N3531, N3527, and N3526" addresses the technical issues.

    Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 19 2009 - 00:41:41 CST