RE: Old Hungarian at SC2/WG2

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Wed Mar 18 2009 - 22:38:30 CST

  • Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: Attack vectors through Unassigned Code Points in IDN"

    But is it clear that N3532 represents a consensus position?

    Peter

    -----Original Message-----
    From: unicore-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicore-bounce@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
    Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 11:01 AM
    To: unicore UnicoRe Discussion; unicode Unicode Discussion
    Subject: Re: Old Hungarian at SC2/WG2

    On 18 Mar 2009, at 17:46, Asmus Freytag wrote:

    > Given the nature of the script there appears to be no defensible
    > reason why any this should be hurried along - especially in the
    > absence of a clear consensus of a wide range of experts (or ideally
    > all of them).

    Asmus, the document N3532 "Mapping between Old Hungarian proposals in
    N3531, N3527, and N3526" addresses the technical issues.

    Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 18 2009 - 22:40:45 CST