Re: [OT] New character request

From: André Szabolcs Szelp (a.sz.szelp@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 10 2009 - 12:20:10 CST

Next message: Christopher Miller: "Re: [OT] New character request"

Previous message: Christopher Key: "[OT] New character request"
In reply to: Christopher Key: "[OT] New character request"
Next in thread: Christopher Miller: "Re: [OT] New character request"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I doubt you can demonstrate that this is not just a glyph variant (and one
obviously in mistake even!) of the regular N.

Szabolcs

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Christopher Key <cjk32@cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> Is [1] sufficient example of usage of a character to merit its inclusion
> in Unicode?
>
> Chris
>
> [1]
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/6774727/Council-ridiculed-over-bus-lane-error.html
>
>

Next message: Christopher Miller: "Re: [OT] New character request"
Previous message: Christopher Key: "[OT] New character request"
In reply to: Christopher Key: "[OT] New character request"
Next in thread: Christopher Miller: "Re: [OT] New character request"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 10 2009 - 12:22:54 CST