Re: [OT] New character request

From: Christopher Miller (christophermiller@mac.com)
Date: Thu Dec 10 2009 - 12:37:32 CST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Quick! Someone write up the proposal!"

Previous message: André Szabolcs Szelp: "Re: [OT] New character request"
In reply to: Christopher Key: "[OT] New character request"
Next in thread: verdy_p: "re: [OT] New character request"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I should think it merely qualifies as a variant of execution (like the reversed "R" in the brand name Toys "[reversed]R" Us or in children's reversed letters due to mistakes of execution that this reversed "R" is meant to emulate). It is not semantically distinct from the regular capital N, not being intended to carry a value within the script that is distinct from that of the regularly formed letter.

On 2009-12-10, at 12:53 PM, Christopher Key wrote:

> Is [1] sufficient example of usage of a character to merit its inclusion
> in Unicode?
>
> Chris
>
> [1]
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/6774727/Council-ridiculed-over-bus-lane-error.html
>

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Quick! Someone write up the proposal!"
Previous message: André Szabolcs Szelp: "Re: [OT] New character request"
In reply to: Christopher Key: "[OT] New character request"
Next in thread: verdy_p: "re: [OT] New character request"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 10 2009 - 12:40:57 CST