re: [OT] New character request

• Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Quick! Someone write up the proposal!"
• In reply to: Christopher Key: "[OT] New character request"
• Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: [OT] New character request"
• Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: [OT] New character request"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

When it is evident that this is an error, even if one wanted to still reproduce it, I still think that this should
be handled as a matter of style (i.e. still using a standard "N" but adding a "glyph-orientation: normal/mirrored"
style (and developping font technologies to allow such transformations, if the transform is affine, or glyph
remappings)...

Philippe.

> Message du 10/12/09 19:32
> De : "Christopher Key"
> A : unicode@unicode.org
> Copie à :
> Objet : [OT] New character request
>
>
> Is [1] sufficient example of usage of a character to merit its inclusion
> in Unicode?
>
> Chris
>
> [1]
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/6774727/Council-ridiculed-over-bus-lane-error.html
>
>
>

• Next message: philip chastney: "Re: [OT] New character request"
• Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Quick! Someone write up the proposal!"
• In reply to: Christopher Key: "[OT] New character request"
• Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: [OT] New character request"
• Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: [OT] New character request"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 10 2009 - 13:29:19 CST