Re: Latin-script keyboard layout (was RE: Quick Question About Korean Input Methods)

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Thu Jan 07 2010 - 20:52:43 CST

  • Next message: Curtis Clark: "Re: Quick Question About Korean Input Methods"

    "verdy_p" <verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr> wrote:

    >> ... (Having multiple options for the same output as in the case of
    >> the "â" and "ê" shown here may be advantageous if you have to use a
    >> computer with something like an AZERTY keyboard).
    >
    > in practice, this is not even needed on a AZERTY keyboard: there's
    > already a standard dead key for the circumflex (which can be typed
    > without pressing any other key), and the ">" is located on the shifted
    > state of the 102th key (whose unshifted state is used for "<").

    That's not a characteristic of "an AZERTY keyboard," that's a
    characteristic of the standard French keyboard. Note the difference. 

    --
Doug Ewell  |  Thornton, Colorado, USA  |  http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14  |  ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s ­

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 07 2010 - 20:54:42 CST