Re: [unicode] kJapaneseOn and kJapaneseKun Use What Romanization Standard?

From: mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
Date: Mon Jan 25 2010 - 09:33:15 CST

  • Next message: Christoph Burgmer: "Re: [unicode] kJapaneseOn and kJapaneseKun Use What Romanization Standard?"

    On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:19:12 -0500
    Ed Trager <ed.trager@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> If anybody wants to "improve" kJapanese{On,Kun} in Unihan.txt,
    >> the detailed use-case should be described, because there might
    >> be some conflicts among the solution for each use-case.
    >>
    >
    >IMHO, a good improvement in Unihan.txt would be to have the readings
    >in Kana instead of romanization. Especially if the romanization is a
    >mixture of 2 different systems, that makes no sense.

    Excuse me, could you tell me what kind of problems are
    caused by mixing 2 different romanization systems? I
    feel it uncomfortable slightly, but not so serious.

    Regards,
    mpsuzuki

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 25 2010 - 09:36:37 CST