From: Frédéric Grosshans (frederic.grosshans@m4x.org)
Date: Wed Feb 17 2010 - 11:54:55 CST
Le mercredi 17 février 2010 à 15:53 +0100, Frédéric Grosshans a écrit :
> >>> On the contrary, Unicode has, on occasion, deliberately encoded
> >>> characters for which there was credible evidence of planned
> >>> widespread future use.
> >>
> >> Which ones, besides EURO SIGN?
>
> > There were a plethora of math characters:
>
> Under some circumstances, the future use doesn't need to be planned nor
> widespread :{...}
Among the characters planned for unicode 6.0, there are also two
unattested Devanagari charcaters, which are part of an new orthographic
reform for Kashmiri. They are the two AW's (*U+0945 and *U+094F) of the
proposals n3710 and n3731.
I think they fit the bill quite well, even if they are not encoded yet.
Fred
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 17 2010 - 11:56:51 CST