Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?

From: Apostolos Syropoulos (ijdt.editor@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Feb 18 2010 - 13:58:41 CST

  • Next message: vanisaac@boil.afraid.org: "Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?"

    2010/2/18 John H. Jenkins <jenkins@apple.com>

    >
    > On Feb 18, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
    >
    >
    > 2010/2/18 <vanisaac@boil.afraid.org>
    >
    >>
    >> Unicode is based on reality, not on hypothetical perfection. It is the
    >> result of compromises that place necessity over convenience,
    >
    >
    >
    > Really? What kind of reality is this that ignores the rules of a language
    > that uses a specific alphabet?
    >
    >
    > The reality of the merger with ISO/IEC 10646. The Greek national body
    > insisted on the inclusion of the current set of extended Greek.
    >
    >
    > Then these people are überbozos.
    Α.Σ.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 18 2010 - 14:00:06 CST