Re: CJK Ideograph Fragments

From: Andrew West (andrewcwest@gmail.com)
Date: Fri May 14 2010 - 16:08:46 CDT

  • Next message: Christoph Päper: "Roman Character Fragments"

    2010/5/14 John H. Jenkins <jenkins@apple.com>:
    >
    > You mean like the CJK strokes?  Yes.

    Character components such as 龰龴龵龶龷龸龹龺龻 (9FB0, 9FB4, 9FB5, 9FB6, 9FB7,
    9FB8, 9FB9, 9FBA, 9FBB) which were encoded in 4.1 because they were
    part of the Hong Kong Supplementary Character Set.

    <http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/wg2/docs/n2808.pdf>

    The fact that these components were part of an existing character set
    greatly facilitated their encoding, but that does not rule out the
    encoding of character components that are not part of an existing
    character set.

    Andrew

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 14 2010 - 16:12:26 CDT