Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)

• Previous message: William_J_G Overington: "Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)"
• In reply to: William_J_G Overington: "Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)"
• Next in thread: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 1 Jun 2010, at 13:31, William_J_G Overington wrote:

> I would find it helpful if some readers could possibly comment on the contents of the document please.

Very well.

This is not character encoding.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/

• Next message: V. M. Kumaraswamy: "Re: IS UNICODE a STANDRAD ?"
• Previous message: William_J_G Overington: "Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)"
• In reply to: William_J_G Overington: "Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)"
• Next in thread: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 01 2010 - 08:07:04 CDT