Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)

From: John H. Jenkins (jenkins@apple.com)
Date: Wed Jun 02 2010 - 11:03:17 CDT

Next message: Tulasi: "Re: IS UNICODE a STANDRAD ?"

Previous message: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)"
In reply to: William_J_G Overington: "Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)"
Next in thread: William_J_G Overington: "Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)"
Reply: William_J_G Overington: "Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:51 AM, William_J_G Overington wrote:

> I know of no reason to think that a person "skilled in the art" would be unable to write an iPad app to receive a program written in the portable interpretable object code arriving within a Unicode text message and then for the program to run in a virtual machine within the app, displaying a graphical result on the screen of the iPad. Could such an app be written based on the information in the paper_draft_005.pdf document?
>

OK, one very last note. The answer to this question is, "No."

=====
John H. Jenkins
jenkins@apple.com

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 02 2010 - 11:04:45 CDT